BLV CATEGORY

Certification & Compliance

Certification and compliance signals for exporters, importers, product teams and founders.

Berlin Vietnam Global buyers
25briefs
7desks
9 updates Archive: July 2026
Forced Labour Evidence: Vietnam-Germany BLV article artwork
Certification & Compliance · European Commission / EUR-Lex · Sep 6, 2026

Forced Labour Evidence: Vietnam-Germany

For a Germany-Vietnam transaction, the practical starting point is a shared product map and a safe escalation path. The German buyer should define the product and evidence it may need to produce if authorities ask questions. The Vietnamese supplier should identify which facilities, subcontractors, inputs and records support that product version and who can correct an error. Neither side should imply that Vietnam, a sector or a supplier is high risk without reliable evidence. A social-audit certificate can be one input, but it cannot by itself prove that every component and upstream stage is free from forced labour. Where a credible concern appears, use proportionate, qualified and worker-safe methods; do not conduct improvised interviews or expose complainants. The Commission's due-diligence guidance is non-binding under this Regulation, although other laws may create separate obligations for particular companies or products.

PPWR Packaging Evidence: Vietnam-Germany BLV article artwork
Certification & Compliance · European Commission / EUR-Lex · Sep 6, 2026

PPWR Packaging Evidence: Vietnam-Germany

Do not assume the Vietnamese factory is automatically the only responsible party, or that a German importer automatically carries every packaging duty. Current guidance from Germany's Central Agency Packaging Register distinguishes the packaging manufacturer from the producer responsible in the country where the packaging becomes waste. In a cross-border chain, the producer depends on who first makes the packaging available in Germany; a foreign company shipping directly to German end users can be the producer. For a company based abroad without a German branch that sells empty packaging or packaged products directly to German end users, current German guidance says an authorised representative must be appointed from 12 August 2026, while registration in the LUCID Packaging Register remains the company's own personal duty. A sale to a German importer can produce a different role allocation. The parties should therefore agree the Incoterms and delivery model, packaging layers, brand shown, first German market actor, LUCID and system-participation responsibilities, document owner and correction path before accepting the order.

Digital Product Passport: Vietnam-Germany BLV article artwork
Certification & Compliance · EUR-Lex / European Commission · Sep 6, 2026

Digital Product Passport: Vietnam-Germany

Treat Digital Product Passport readiness as a shared buyer-supplier information project. The Vietnamese manufacturer controls much of the material, production and facility evidence. The German importer, distributor or brand owner needs to determine the applicable EU role, monitor product-specific rules and decide how the data will connect to its market and compliance systems. Before signing a technology contract, agree the product identifier, model-versus-batch granularity, data owners, evidence standard, access boundaries, update process, retention expectation and correction route. Keep public product information separate from confidential formulas, supplier terms and personal data. Most importantly, do not claim that a Digital Product Passport is already mandatory for every product. The exact requirement only becomes clear through the relevant product-specific measure and its transition period.

GPSR: Vietnam-Germany BLV article artwork
Certification & Compliance · EUR-Lex / European Commission · Sep 6, 2026

GPSR: Vietnam-Germany

For a manufacturer outside the EU, product evidence and listing evidence must meet at the same handover point. Before placement on the EU market, identify the EU-established economic operator responsible for the tasks assigned by Article 16 and record that party's name, postal address and electronic address in the required product, packaging, parcel or accompanying-document location. For a German online offer, prepare a listing pack that clearly connects the offer to the manufacturer; the EU responsible person when the manufacturer is outside the Union; a product picture, type and identifier; and required warnings or safety information in a language consumers can easily understand as determined by the destination Member State. Do not treat a marketplace form as the underlying safety file. The German importer or seller needs the evidence behind the fields, while the Vietnamese manufacturer needs a controlled way to keep the product version, label, instructions, tests and listing copy aligned. The handover should also name the owners for complaints, accidents, corrective action and recall communication. A certification mark or test report can support the assessment when relevant, but it does not replace checking the actual product, legal scope and role allocation.

CBAM emissions data: Vietnam-Germany trade BLV article artwork
Certification & Compliance · European Commission, Taxation and Customs Union · Sep 6, 2026

CBAM emissions data: Vietnam-Germany trade

Treat the choice between default and actual values as a joint pre-contract decision. Default values can reduce the producer's verification workload, but they do not remove the importer's other CBAM obligations. Actual values may be useful when the producer has mature installation data and can complete accredited verification, but they are not automatically the better commercial route. The authorised declarant on the German side controls the declaration and certificate obligation; the Vietnamese producer controls much of the production evidence. Their contract should therefore name the data route, owner, format, deadline, correction process and confidentiality boundary. Do not advertise a low-carbon advantage or quote a CBAM cost benefit until the exact goods, calculation and verification path support it.

EVFTA proof of origin for Vietnam-Germany trade BLV article artwork
Certification & Compliance · European Commission / Official Journal of the European Union · Sep 6, 2026

EVFTA proof of origin for Vietnam-Germany trade

Treat origin as a shared pre-shipment evidence decision, not as a document the exporter adds after production. The Vietnamese exporter controls much of the production and material evidence. The German importer controls the customs claim and needs enough detail to judge whether preference is supportable. A useful handover therefore connects one commercial product and shipment to its HS code, bill of materials, supplier declarations, production steps, invoices, transport documents and selected proof route. It should also name who checked each assumption and what remains unresolved. Customs authorities may verify proofs at random or when they have reasonable doubts, request evidence and inspect exporter accounts. If verification does not establish authenticity and originating status, preferential treatment can be refused. The practical standard is simple: do not promise an EVFTA duty outcome in a quotation until the product-specific rule and evidence path have been checked. Use the European Commission's Access2Markets tools for a current product-level check, and confirm the final procedure with the responsible customs authority or a qualified adviser.

EUDR readiness: the evidence German buyers need from Vietnam BLV article artwork
Certification & Compliance · European Commission · Aug 23, 2026

EUDR readiness: the evidence German buyers need from Vietnam

Treat EUDR readiness as buyer onboarding, not as a last-minute certificate request. The strongest handover is a version-controlled chain of evidence with named owners, clear batch links and an agreed correction process. Before accepting an order, the Vietnamese supplier and German buyer should confirm the current Annex I product scope, identify their respective operator or trader roles, and agree which party enters information into the EU system. Germany's Federal Office for Agriculture and Food is the responsible German authority, while the European Commission's current implementation page and FAQ should control deadline and scope checks. This operational brief is not legal advice; exact product codes and obligations require transaction-specific review.

Archive July 2026

25 published intelligence briefs are available in this preview desk.

Latest month